February 2010
News    |   New Media     Advertising   |   Communications     Films   |  Events
 

My vote and I

Two debates tend to tail into periodic appraisals of how to deepen our democracy. One lingers on voter turnouts at elections. It celebrates rising turnouts in different parts of the country — for instance, just this weekend turnout was almost 60 per cent in the last phase of the Jharkhand assembly elections, that too in territory that includes many Maoist strongholds. The takeaway is that this faith in electoral democracy is about more than statistics at the polling booth, it is a call to unknot the string that runs through processes to make legislators accountable and those to make politics responsive through meaningful decentralisation.

The other debate intersects the first tangentially, and centres on the choices voters could rightfully have — could they, for example, obtain the right to reject the fray, or even to recall elected representatives? Alert to the populist consequences of such direct democratic practices, many have argued that perhaps the best instrument for a voter to register dissatisfaction is the right not to vote. It is in this wider context that the Gujarat assembly’s okay to a bill to make voting compulsory in local bodies must be assessed. The state’s urban development minister insists that the main point is not to punish the “defaulter voter” but to encourage the voter “to spare some time to exercise his right to vote”. But is this the right way?

The argument for compulsory voting is that it establishes the vote as an entitlement — employers would have to give voters time off to go vote, election authorities would be liable for getting a voter on to the electoral rolls. And overall, the final decision would presumably be as close as possible to determining the will of the majority. That may be all to the good — though in India we already have provisions to ensure voters get time off to exercise their franchise — but in balance compulsory voting is too problematic a concept. It is distinctly undemocratic to coerce a citizen to do something (vote) which, by the very definition of democracy, is supposed to be based on free will. That is, the right not to vote must remain a democratically obtained right. And if politicians want high turnouts, it’s their job to mobilise the electorate.

 
  Home
  Newsroom
  Online edition
  News analysis
 
  Opinion – All Opinion
  • Letters to the editor
  • Corresspondents Diary
  • Debates
 
  World Politics - World   This Week
  Special Report
  
  Business- This Week
  • Leadership and Change
  • Executive Education
  • Marketing & Innovation
  • Strategic Management
  • Politics and Public Policy
  • Human Resources
  • Business Ethics
  • Innovation and Entrepreneurship
 
  Special Sections
  Books & Art
  City Briefings
  
  
 
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Subscribe
Copyright © Conversations Online 2010. All rights reserved.
SPONSORS FEATURE
About Sponsorship :
Selected sponsors provide financial support for parts of Conversationsonline.org in return for the display of their name, logo and links to their site(s) on those sections. Conversationsonline retains full editorial control, giving no sponsor any influence whatsoever over any content, including choice of topics, the views expressed, or the style of presentation of any content.